At Mon, 9 Jun 2008 11:14:37 +0200,
K Okamoto wrote:
> I searched gsl_max in the bug archives to no avail so I am guessing
> this is the first time? In any event I found GSL_MAX to occasionally
> give the wrong answer. Here's the code:
I've added a note to the manual:
Note that the following macros perform multiple evaluations of their
arguments, so they should not be used with arguments that have side
effects (such as a call to a random number generator).
Thanks for your email.
--
Brian Gough
GNU Scientific Library -
http://www.gnu.org/software/gsl/
